PokerOnline Casino
Kundeservice  383 230 25|  CET 04:31   ET 10:31 PM   GMT 03:31 |
 
 
Glemt dit password? | Registrering
Du er her: Forsiden / Community / Forum / NewsRoom / Main /
Arrow down

LEADERBOARDS!

 

Bedømmelse: 

  •  
  • 55%
  •  
 (9 stemmer)


For at kunne skrive i alle fora skal du have indbetalt penge på din konto. Hvis du ikke ønsker at foretage nogen indbetaling, kan du skrive i Social Lounge.

For at opnå ubegrænset adgang skal du foretage en indbetaling - du kan gøre det med det samme!

 
Der vises 11-20 af 43 Tilbage | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Næste

earthwizard  earthwizard Enthusiast
Posts: 981 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 16, 2007 01:25 PM. Indlæg 11
if i worked this out right using the formula above when playing a 5 buck sng 10 players do you get 200 points for winning it, or have i worked it out completly wrong?

help needed here thx in anticipation.
 
 

Jeff_Wood  Jeff_Wood Senior member
Posts: 3312 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 16, 2007 06:28 PM. Indlæg 12
Nice job PR. Thanks for this extra feature!

Pug makes some valuable points btw.
 
 

micky d10  micky d10 Senior member
Posts: 170 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 17, 2007 03:00 PM. Indlæg 13
As puggy says the formula in its current form favours volume over quality so there are some changes I would make to the formula.

1. I would replace F with X/E where X is the prizepool and E is the number of entrants.
This would give more value to the rebuys as it would produce an average buy in for the tournament.

2. I would also have an extra multiplication of (I-P)+1 where I is the number of positions paid and P Finishing position.
If (I-P) is negative then it becomes zero.
i.e you dont get any points for finishing outside of the money.

Also this would reward the larger tournaments more.

i.e. more points are awarded to a player that wins a tournament that pays 20 players than one which pays 10 players.

So the formula would look like this:

L + (√F*√2.5)*( √E*√3)*(√((I-P)+1) / ((P+1)*2) * 100

I have changed the constant on the bottom row from 1.5 to 2 so that the extra multiplication will not cause the points to be ridiculous high.

I think this would be a more accurate measure of the best performing players on the site.

micky d10
 
 

mussorgsky  mussorgsky Enthusiast
Posts: 8344 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 18, 2007 04:22 AM. Indlæg 14
L + ((√F*√2.5)*( √E*√3)*(√((I-P)+1) / ((P+1)*2) * 100) + 50000iiap





Nice new feature, PR. wd mr.typo.
 
 

lykanthropos  lykanthropos Enthusiast
Posts: 5115 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:34 AM. Indlæg 15
Ok, since start of teamplay i have written down where i place;

10, 3, 6, 11, 1, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2.

U asked for comments on leaderboard GR, and i dont see how i can be ranked 60 on the yearly, with players i havent even heard of in front of me. (my results arent necessary in 100% chronological order.)

PS, some teams couldnt play for ages cause of the teamwallet problem, does the leaderboard consider this?
 
 

AREZ_ONE  AREZ_ONE Enthusiast
Posts: 3073 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:40 AM. Indlæg 16
You know, I never understood the "Footballer of the Year" competition either. It‘s a damn team sport! A templayer leaderboard is a pretty useless gadget in my opinion.
 
 

lykanthropos  lykanthropos Enthusiast
Posts: 5115 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:43 AM. Indlæg 17
I agree Pat.. it should be about the team, not singleplayers.

However, that board was so funny i had to comment it.
 
 

AREZ_ONE  AREZ_ONE Enthusiast
Posts: 3073 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:47 AM. Indlæg 18
Since some teams weren‘t able to play for quite some time, a team leaderboard is a pretty useless gadget too.
 
 

amh11  amh11 Enthusiast
Posts: 5851 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:57 AM. Indlæg 19
I think the yearly leaderboard is faultless and splendidly accurate. very_happy wink
 
 

KingKev  KingKev Pokah! addict
Posts: 2910 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:57 AM. Indlæg 20
Leaderboards will always favour quantity over quality unless the formula used is a zero sum formula accross all entrants. Even awarded 0 if you fail to reach the pay structure doesnt penalise you.

Easiest formula is total $ won/lost LOL
 
 
Der vises 11-20 af 43 Tilbage | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Næste
  © PokerRoom.com - siden 1999 - Databeskyttelse - Alm. Forretningsbetingelser - Om os - Sitemap   PokerAffiliate.com