PokerOnline Casino
Customer Service  +44 207 026 4217|  CET 07:21   ET 01:21 AM   GMT 06:21 |
 
 
Forgot Password? | Sign Up
You are here: Home / Community / Forum / NewsRoom / Main /
Arrow down

LEADERBOARDS!

 

Rating: 

  •  
  • 55%
  •  
 (9 votes)


To post in all forums you need to be a depositing player. If you have not or cannot make a deposit you can post in the Social Lounge.

To get full access make a deposit now!

 
Showing 11-20 of 43 Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next

earthwizard GB earthwizard Enthusiast
Posts: 948 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 16, 2007 01:25 PM. Post 11
if i worked this out right using the formula above when playing a 5 buck sng 10 players do you get 200 points for winning it, or have i worked it out completly wrong?

help needed here thx in anticipation.
 
reply
 

Jeff_Wood NL Jeff_Wood Senior member
Posts: 3312 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 16, 2007 06:28 PM. Post 12
Nice job PR. Thanks for this extra feature!

Pug makes some valuable points btw.
 
reply
 

micky d10 GB micky d10 Senior member
Posts: 168 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 17, 2007 03:00 PM. Post 13
As puggy says the formula in its current form favours volume over quality so there are some changes I would make to the formula.

1. I would replace F with X/E where X is the prizepool and E is the number of entrants.
This would give more value to the rebuys as it would produce an average buy in for the tournament.

2. I would also have an extra multiplication of (I-P)+1 where I is the number of positions paid and P Finishing position.
If (I-P) is negative then it becomes zero.
i.e you dont get any points for finishing outside of the money.

Also this would reward the larger tournaments more.

i.e. more points are awarded to a player that wins a tournament that pays 20 players than one which pays 10 players.

So the formula would look like this:

L + (√F*√2.5)*( √E*√3)*(√((I-P)+1) / ((P+1)*2) * 100

I have changed the constant on the bottom row from 1.5 to 2 so that the extra multiplication will not cause the points to be ridiculous high.

I think this would be a more accurate measure of the best performing players on the site.

micky d10
 
reply
 

mussorgsky GB mussorgsky Enthusiast
Posts: 7979 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 18, 2007 04:22 AM. Post 14
L + ((√F*√2.5)*( √E*√3)*(√((I-P)+1) / ((P+1)*2) * 100) + 50000iiap





Nice new feature, PR. wd mr.typo.
 
reply
 

lykanthropos NO lykanthropos Enthusiast
Posts: 4741 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:34 AM. Post 15
Ok, since start of teamplay i have written down where i place;

10, 3, 6, 11, 1, 1, 2, 1, 4, 1, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2.

U asked for comments on leaderboard GR, and i dont see how i can be ranked 60 on the yearly, with players i havent even heard of in front of me. (my results arent necessary in 100% chronological order.)

PS, some teams couldnt play for ages cause of the teamwallet problem, does the leaderboard consider this?
 
reply
 

AREZ_ONE CH AREZ_ONE Enthusiast
Posts: 3021 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:40 AM. Post 16
You know, I never understood the "Footballer of the Year" competition either. It‘s a damn team sport! A templayer leaderboard is a pretty useless gadget in my opinion.
 
reply
 

lykanthropos NO lykanthropos Enthusiast
Posts: 4741 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:43 AM. Post 17
I agree Pat.. it should be about the team, not singleplayers.

However, that board was so funny i had to comment it.
 
reply
 

AREZ_ONE CH AREZ_ONE Enthusiast
Posts: 3021 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:47 AM. Post 18
Since some teams weren‘t able to play for quite some time, a team leaderboard is a pretty useless gadget too.
 
reply
 

amh11 GB amh11 Senior member
Posts: 5552 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:57 AM. Post 19
I think the yearly leaderboard is faultless and splendidly accurate. very_happy wink
 
reply
 

KingKev GB KingKev Pokah! addict
Posts: 2883 		 

RE: Leaderboards!

Aug 19, 2007 07:57 AM. Post 20
Leaderboards will always favour quantity over quality unless the formula used is a zero sum formula accross all entrants. Even awarded 0 if you fail to reach the pay structure doesnt penalise you.

Easiest formula is total $ won/lost LOL
 
reply
 
Showing 11-20 of 43 Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next
  © PokerRoom.com Established 1999 - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About PokerRoom - Site Map   PokerAffiliate.com